Zio XT recommended by NICE in the latest CVD impact report to detect cardiac arrhythmias

Click here to see the full report

Zio. All the data you need.

With the Zio XT you’ll have access to a powerful ECG monitor that delivers high-quality, accurate data, helping you to make a diagnosis.

Zio XT Long-Term Continuous Monitor

A person wearing the Zio XT heart monitor.
Zio XT was designed with the patient in mind, so they can go about their lives with minimal disruption. No battery charges or replacements, or electrode repositioning are required. As a result, real-world data shows an impressive 98% patient compliance.2
0 patient manipulations2

98% patient compliance2

88% of patients found Zio easy to use2

83% of patients would wear Zio again2

Long-term continuous monitor


Zio XT vs implant pacemaker yield chart

Zio XT is as accurate as the gold standard at detecting AF burden.4

“We think there’s huge value in this technology in terms of its clinical use and we’ve certainly been lucky recipients of this technology, as have our patients. Zio has made a big impact already in terms of getting appropriate monitoring for our patients and yielding some early important outcomes that can change clinical management” - Dr Joe Mills, Cardiologist at Liverpool Heart and Chest NHS Hospital

Easy application. No leads or wires.

Zio XT is a single-use monitor, and has been designed for simple application. The Zio XT comes with all that you need to deliver a seamless patient experience.

Transform Your Cardiac Monitoring Capabilities

The Zio service helps you detect arrhythmias earlier, reduce administrative burden, and enhance patient experience — all through a single, streamlined platform.

 

Connect with an iRhythm specialist today to discover how the Zio Service can fit into your workflow.

 

Start the conversation today.

 

If you are a patient, please contact our Customer Care Team at +44 808 189 3411 or by emailing us at supportuk@irhythmtech.com

†Avoid excessive sweating. Do not shower for the initial 24 hours.

1. Barret, P. et al., Comparison of 24 hour Holter monitoring versus 14 day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring. American Journal of Medicine, 2014.

2. Data on file. iRhythm Technologies, 2020.

3. Tsang, J.P. et al. Benefits of monitoring patients with mobile cardiac telemetry (MCT) compared with the Event or Holter monitors. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research, 2014.

4. Eysenck, W., et al. A randomized trial evaluating the accuracy of AF detection by four external ambulatory ECG monitors compared to permanent pacemaker AF detection. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2019.

WEB0065.01