Two Zio monitors.
All the data you need.
Long-Term Continuous Monitor

Long-Term Continuous Monitor
Mobile Cardiac Telemetry Monitor

Mobile Cardiac Telemetry Monitor

Zio XT
- MONITOR TYPE
Long-term continuous monitor
(up to 14 days) - ALERTS
None - DAILY REPORTS
None - FINAL REPORT
Comprehensive final XT patient report at end of prescribed wear period

Zio AT
- MONITOR TYPE
Mobile cardiac telemetry monitor
(up to 14 days) - ALERTS*
Included - DAILY REPORTS
Yes - FINAL REPORT
Comprehensive final AT patient report at end of prescribed wear period

“People aren’t taking these devices off. They’re leaving them on, and we’re getting the data we need.”
Daniel Bensimhon, MD
Cardiologist, specializing in heart failure
Greensboro, NC
Over 50% of arrhythmias are missed by Holter monitors.2
in 14 days2
in 2 days2
The monitor
patients prefer.3
Zio XT and Zio AT were designed with the patient in mind, so they can go about their lives with minimal disruption. No battery charges or replacements, or electrode repositioning are required. As a result, real-world data shows an impressive 98% patient compliance.4
0 patient
manipulations5
98% patient
compliance4
88% of patients
found Zio
easy to use6
83% of patients
would wear
Zio again6
diagnostic yield.4,7


manipulations
(up to 14 days)
(up to 30 days)
(up to 30 days)
One application process.
Zio for all of your patients.
Zio XT and Zio AT are single-use monitors, and have been designed for simple application — either in clinic, or by patients in their own homes. When telehealth is desired, Zio will send a monitor directly to your patient’s home and provide patient-friendly instructions to ensure application is as easy as possible.
Let’s talk.
- Avoid excessive sweating. Do not shower for the initial 24 hours.
- Zio XT and Zio AT are contraindicated for critical care patients.
- Patient-observed and automatically detected arrhythmia events are transmitted to a monitoring center for reporting.
- Data on file. iRhythm Technologies, 2021.
- Turakhia, M. et al. Diagnostic Utility of a Novel Leadless Arrhythmia Monitorng Device, American Journal of Cardiology, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.04.017
- Barret, P. et al. Comparison of 24 hour Holter monitoring versus 14 day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring. American Journal of Medicine, 2014.
- Data on file. iRhythm Technologies, 2019.
- Zio AT Clinical Reference Manual.
- Data on file. iRhythm Technologies, 2020.
- Tsang, J.P. et al. Benefits of monitoring patients with mobile cardiac telemetry (MCT) compared with the Event or Holter monitors. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research, 2014.
- Eysenck, W. et al. A randomized trial evaluating the accuracy of AF detection by four external ambulatory ECG monitors compared to permanent pacemaker AF detection. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2019.
- Traditional Wired MCT: CardioNet MCOTos Patient Education Guide, MCT 3 Lead Patient Guide; Competitor A Patch: MCOT Patch Patient Education Guide; Competitor B Patch: BodyGuardian Heart